Posts tagged Jamie S. Rich

iamdavidbrothers:

graemem:

chadnevett:

twiststreet:

comicsalliance:

DARK HORSE PUSHES 12 CREATOR-OWNED SERIES FOR SDCC, INCLUDING ‘FIGHT CLUB 2′, ‘LADY KILLER’, AND ‘HELLBOY AND THE B.P.R.D.’
By Andrew Wheeler
Over the last twelve days, Dark Horse has thrown a spotlight on twelve new creator-owned titles that they plan to promote at this year’s San Diego Comic-Con. The series include the Fight Club sequel from Chuck Palahniuk and Cameron Stewart
READ MORE

How much of the Fight Club sequel is Cameron Stewart going to own?  

How many of the creative personnel on a comic have to own a piece for it to be considered creator-owned?
Coming soon to a comics discussion near you: “Semi-creator-owned.”

Weirdly enough, I was thinking of this yesterday in terms of Image. For all intents and purposes, is Supreme: Blue Rose considered a creator-owned comic or a work-for-hire gig? Rob Liefeld owns Supreme, sure, but for Warren Ellis and Tula Lotay, what’s the difference between working on that book versus working on something for Marvel and DC? Is Prophet creator-owned or work-for-hire, in that Brandon Graham and his artists own none of it, but the guy who created the original character owns the whole thing?
Which “creators” are we talking about when it comes to defining “creator-owned,” is what I’m asking, I guess?

I think it’s a mix of both. Prophet is a work-for-hire project on a creator-owned book. The original creator owns the property, but hires people to work on it. Both are true, but not mutually exclusive. It’s more of a line with several points (full creator-owned and fully work-for-hire for a corporation are on opposite ends, I think, “creator participation” toward the corp side, wfh on c-o toward the full c-o side) than two opposites. I’ve been thinking about this a lot but haven’t quite managed to figure out how I feel yet.

My feelings about this widely vary and can be muddled, too, but I’m going to vomit out some thoughts here.
It Girl and the Atomics was essentially work-for-hire for the team creating it, as the characters were owned by Mike Allred and yet, as a creative experience, it was no different than the rest of the comics I create and own myself (with collaborators). We had free rein to do as we pleased, with Mike as the most hands-off of editors. We were paid and given an appropriate portion of the back-end. I don’t think anyone on that book would feel we were lacking in “ownership” in any way. As with most art and business, it’s all how you’re treated. I’ve seen legit creator-owned teams who treat each other like crap or where one guy dominates over another and are as bad as any of the dumb stories you hear about bad faith breakdowns coming out of the Big Two.As an editor, I’ve serviced all manner of combinations where a sole creator owned the book and had folks on board as collaborators to help them, and I’m sure also encountered a few where the original creator was just overseer. Hellboy is a franchise that no one would argue isn’t completely creator-driven and, at the end of the day, creator-owned. There can be a point where a creation becomes bigger than the one guy who is behind it or have a life beyond that initial spark, or with something like Fight Club, jump from medium to medium, and still have that first guy in charge. There’s an element of it that strikes me as similar to those guys who bang-on about pure comics being one cartoonist alone in a room doing it all his or herself. Is it how it’s done or what comes out of it?
Actually, the whole “what is creator owned?” thing  makes me think of all the hairs that get split over the term “indie,” and the ways that indie eventually got manipulated and turned into a description rather than just an existence. It’s what happens when terms such as these are transformed into marketing slugs, alas. It wasn’t that long ago when we could have shouted up from down in the trenches that something was creator-owned and no one gave a good goddamn what that meant, and no more than ten years ago there were often big-name creators claiming publicly, “I can’t do that because I can’t work for free.” Because ownership wasn’t perceived as immediate value. Not to mention the ongoing impression in certain segments of fandom that to go from your own stuff to working on Corporate-Trademark Man is somehow “making it.”
So you can see what I meant when I said my own thinking gets muddled. There’s part of me that is sitting in the back of the room with his arms folded, grumbling, “Where y’all been?”
But at the end of the day, it’s going to come down to who delivers the goods and who isn’t a jackass about it and to what books the reader actually ends up liking. And maybe those will be books where some of us are jackasses, because it’s not like good rock-and-roll never came out of a couple of funny-looking weirdoes barely on speaking terms banging out an album. 
Just promise me you’ll all still be here when the anti-copyright mob comes to pry my Circle-Cs out of my cold dead hands, okay? ;)
Respectfully yours,
Comics’ Raggedy Ass Grampa
P.S. I reserve the right to regret this post immediately after hitting send.

iamdavidbrothers:

graemem:

chadnevett:

twiststreet:

comicsalliance:

DARK HORSE PUSHES 12 CREATOR-OWNED SERIES FOR SDCC, INCLUDING ‘FIGHT CLUB 2′, ‘LADY KILLER’, AND ‘HELLBOY AND THE B.P.R.D.’

By Andrew Wheeler

Over the last twelve days, Dark Horse has thrown a spotlight on twelve new creator-owned titles that they plan to promote at this year’s San Diego Comic-Con. The series include the Fight Club sequel from Chuck Palahniuk and Cameron Stewart

READ MORE

How much of the Fight Club sequel is Cameron Stewart going to own?  

How many of the creative personnel on a comic have to own a piece for it to be considered creator-owned?

Coming soon to a comics discussion near you: “Semi-creator-owned.”

Weirdly enough, I was thinking of this yesterday in terms of Image. For all intents and purposes, is Supreme: Blue Rose considered a creator-owned comic or a work-for-hire gig? Rob Liefeld owns Supreme, sure, but for Warren Ellis and Tula Lotay, what’s the difference between working on that book versus working on something for Marvel and DC? Is Prophet creator-owned or work-for-hire, in that Brandon Graham and his artists own none of it, but the guy who created the original character owns the whole thing?

Which “creators” are we talking about when it comes to defining “creator-owned,” is what I’m asking, I guess?

I think it’s a mix of both. Prophet is a work-for-hire project on a creator-owned book. The original creator owns the property, but hires people to work on it. Both are true, but not mutually exclusive. It’s more of a line with several points (full creator-owned and fully work-for-hire for a corporation are on opposite ends, I think, “creator participation” toward the corp side, wfh on c-o toward the full c-o side) than two opposites. I’ve been thinking about this a lot but haven’t quite managed to figure out how I feel yet.

My feelings about this widely vary and can be muddled, too, but I’m going to vomit out some thoughts here.

It Girl and the Atomics was essentially work-for-hire for the team creating it, as the characters were owned by Mike Allred and yet, as a creative experience, it was no different than the rest of the comics I create and own myself (with collaborators). We had free rein to do as we pleased, with Mike as the most hands-off of editors. We were paid and given an appropriate portion of the back-end. I don’t think anyone on that book would feel we were lacking in “ownership” in any way. As with most art and business, it’s all how you’re treated. I’ve seen legit creator-owned teams who treat each other like crap or where one guy dominates over another and are as bad as any of the dumb stories you hear about bad faith breakdowns coming out of the Big Two.

As an editor, I’ve serviced all manner of combinations where a sole creator owned the book and had folks on board as collaborators to help them, and I’m sure also encountered a few where the original creator was just overseer. Hellboy is a franchise that no one would argue isn’t completely creator-driven and, at the end of the day, creator-owned. There can be a point where a creation becomes bigger than the one guy who is behind it or have a life beyond that initial spark, or with something like Fight Club, jump from medium to medium, and still have that first guy in charge. There’s an element of it that strikes me as similar to those guys who bang-on about pure comics being one cartoonist alone in a room doing it all his or herself. Is it how it’s done or what comes out of it?

Actually, the whole “what is creator owned?” thing  makes me think of all the hairs that get split over the term “indie,” and the ways that indie eventually got manipulated and turned into a description rather than just an existence. It’s what happens when terms such as these are transformed into marketing slugs, alas. It wasn’t that long ago when we could have shouted up from down in the trenches that something was creator-owned and no one gave a good goddamn what that meant, and no more than ten years ago there were often big-name creators claiming publicly, “I can’t do that because I can’t work for free.” Because ownership wasn’t perceived as immediate value. Not to mention the ongoing impression in certain segments of fandom that to go from your own stuff to working on Corporate-Trademark Man is somehow “making it.”

So you can see what I meant when I said my own thinking gets muddled. There’s part of me that is sitting in the back of the room with his arms folded, grumbling, “Where y’all been?”

But at the end of the day, it’s going to come down to who delivers the goods and who isn’t a jackass about it and to what books the reader actually ends up liking. And maybe those will be books where some of us are jackasses, because it’s not like good rock-and-roll never came out of a couple of funny-looking weirdoes barely on speaking terms banging out an album. 

Just promise me you’ll all still be here when the anti-copyright mob comes to pry my Circle-Cs out of my cold dead hands, okay? ;)

Respectfully yours,

Comics’ Raggedy Ass Grampa

P.S. I reserve the right to regret this post immediately after hitting send.

61 notes

In Ares & Aphrodite, Gigi’s french bulldog is named Spencer. After Spencer Tracy. 

Art and coloring is by Megan Levens. The comic will be released through Oni Press in 2015.

Just proofed the script for Ares & Aphrodite one last time before sending it to Crank! to letter. It’s been a year, I forgot how much I really like these characters.
Megan Levens posted this sneak peek image of the female lead, Gigi Averelle, on Facebook yesterday. The coloring has begun!

Just proofed the script for Ares & Aphrodite one last time before sending it to Crank! to letter. It’s been a year, I forgot how much I really like these characters.

Megan Levens posted this sneak peek image of the female lead, Gigi Averelle, on Facebook yesterday. The coloring has begun!

comicsalliance:

LADY KILLER: JOËLLE JONES’ NEW PROJECT FINDS THE HAPPY MEDIUM BETWEEN HOMEMAKING AND HOMICIDE
By Andy Khouri
Some of the stories Americans love most are those that put the lie to our prevailing visions of ourselves. The work of David Lynch, who peels back the the saccharine layers of suburbia to reveal unspeakable horrors within; Mad Men, with its systematic deconstruction of everything we think we believe about success in this country; and Breaking Bad, which shows us how even the most seemingly wholesome members of society can be monsters waiting to break free.
If you think all that sounds well and good but probably a little too stuffy, Josie Schuller would probably agree with you. Josie is a young housewife living post-war America. She sells makeup door-to-door, she takes care of her twin kids and the family dog, she makes dinner for her husband, and she suffers her endlessly disapproving mother-in-law. That is, when she’s not murdering people in astonishingly violent ways.
Josie’s a highly trained assassin, and the paradox that is her life comes courtesy of cartoonist Joélle Jones and co-writer Jamie S. Rich, whose new Dark Horse series Lady Killer invites readers into a weirdly alluring story that follows a grand tradition of subverting Americana, but with a uniquely wicked, black comedy twist and what Josie might even say is a woman’s touch.
READ MORE

comicsalliance:

LADY KILLER: JOËLLE JONES’ NEW PROJECT FINDS THE HAPPY MEDIUM BETWEEN HOMEMAKING AND HOMICIDE

By Andy Khouri

Some of the stories Americans love most are those that put the lie to our prevailing visions of ourselves. The work of David Lynch, who peels back the the saccharine layers of suburbia to reveal unspeakable horrors within; Mad Men, with its systematic deconstruction of everything we think we believe about success in this country; and Breaking Bad, which shows us how even the most seemingly wholesome members of society can be monsters waiting to break free.

If you think all that sounds well and good but probably a little too stuffy, Josie Schuller would probably agree with you. Josie is a young housewife living post-war America. She sells makeup door-to-door, she takes care of her twin kids and the family dog, she makes dinner for her husband, and she suffers her endlessly disapproving mother-in-law. That is, when she’s not murdering people in astonishingly violent ways.

Josie’s a highly trained assassin, and the paradox that is her life comes courtesy of cartoonist Joélle Jones and co-writer Jamie S. Rich, whose new Dark Horse series Lady Killer invites readers into a weirdly alluring story that follows a grand tradition of subverting Americana, but with a uniquely wicked, black comedy twist and what Josie might even say is a woman’s touch.

READ MORE

63 notes

darkhorsecomics:

"I wanted to play in that world with all the stereotypical characters but to take it someplace darker because that is the sort of thing I am naturally drawn to.”ComicsAlliance has all the details on today’s #SDCCannounce—
LADY KILLER, Joëlle Jones' new series about a deadly assassin, living as a homemaker in 50s-era post-war America!

darkhorsecomics:

"I wanted to play in that world with all the stereotypical characters but to take it someplace darker because that is the sort of thing I am naturally drawn to.”

ComicsAlliance has all the details on today’s #SDCCannounce

LADY KILLER, Joëlle Jones' new series about a deadly assassin, living as a homemaker in 50s-era post-war America!

89 notes

MADAME FRANKENSTEIN #6 (of 7)story: JAMIE S. RICHart: MEGAN LEVENScover: JOELLE JONES & NICK FILARDIOCTOBER 1 / 32 PAGES / BW / T+ / $2.99Tensions build to a boil. Henry confronts Vincent about his messing around with dead bodies and Vincent’s new girlfriend comes snooping in the lab. Violence erupts when the mad doctor’s creation meets her replacement!
Coming from Image Comics.

MADAME FRANKENSTEIN #6 (of 7)
story: JAMIE S. RICH
art: MEGAN LEVENS
cover: JOELLE JONES & NICK FILARDI

OCTOBER 1 / 32 PAGES / BW / T+ / $2.99

Tensions build to a boil. Henry confronts Vincent about his messing around with dead bodies and Vincent’s new girlfriend comes snooping in the lab. Violence erupts when the mad doctor’s creation meets her replacement!

Coming from Image Comics.

2 notes

Lady Killer #1 cover by Joëlle Jones & Laura Allred.
Coming January from Dark Horse Comics.
Written and drawn by Jones, colors by Allred, additional dialogue by Jamie S. Rich.
More details in the announcement.

Lady Killer #1 cover by Joëlle Jones & Laura Allred.

Coming January from Dark Horse Comics.

Written and drawn by Jones, colors by Allred, additional dialogue by Jamie S. Rich.

More details in the announcement.

9 notes

There’s still time to jump on Madame Frankenstein. Our fourth issue is the beginning of the second act, and the final order cut-off is Monday. Give you comic book retailer this code: JUN140554.
Don MacPherson at Eye on Comics gave us a 9/10 for our third issue. 
Madame Frankenstein is a fascinating new spin on the Frankenstein concept. Rich has opted to set it in a different period, and the early 20th-century society that serves as the backdrop is really one of the most interesting characters in the book. Artist Megan Levens brings the time to life adeptly. Her style reminds me a great deal of that of Joëlle (Helheim) Jones, which should come as no big surprise. Jones and Rich are frequently collaborators, and she provides the cover art for this series.
So you know we’re doing a good job!
Above is some of what you’ll see in #4.

There’s still time to jump on Madame Frankenstein. Our fourth issue is the beginning of the second act, and the final order cut-off is Monday. Give you comic book retailer this code: JUN140554.

Don MacPherson at Eye on Comics gave us a 9/10 for our third issue

Madame Frankenstein is a fascinating new spin on the Frankenstein concept. Rich has opted to set it in a different period, and the early 20th-century society that serves as the backdrop is really one of the most interesting characters in the book. Artist Megan Levens brings the time to life adeptly. Her style reminds me a great deal of that of Joëlle (Helheim) Jones, which should come as no big surprise. Jones and Rich are frequently collaborators, and she provides the cover art for this series.

So you know we’re doing a good job!

Above is some of what you’ll see in #4.

2 notes